Kj jeep engineering is good IN FAVOUR OF THE KJ.
THESE JEEPS ARE WELL DESIGNED (engineered) IN MANY REGARDS, that is my opinion unequivocallyas an engineer…..I know they are not perfect but they have some VERY ,VERY good points. Here are some examples of why I feel my truck is such a good little beast. I have come to this realisation as I came out of warranty and started doing my own work on the tough little truck. GOOD ENGINEERING EXAMPLE 1:The design is such that when you do replace the LCA/Lower clevis arm bushing you only need select spanners. Each bolt has a securely mounted lock-tab cold welded to its head such that on tightening and undoing, you do not need a spanner on the head of the bolt. The heads have, in fact, been made an odd size so you have trouble finding one that fits FOR A GOOD REASON…..even tho Jeep dealership did try!!!!! This is a gem – you can torque up after jouncing when the suspension is at normal height….pretty important NO? Access is needed from the front only and it is REALLY EASY! Special tools needed for this every-day type job: The only points I would make is that a long series socket for the drop link between the LCA and the stabiliser bar (18mm AF) and a 21 mm AF long series socket for the clevis bracket to LCA nut help you use a torque wrench. An alternative is to use “crows – foot spanners” with the torque wrench for setting torque. GOOD ENGINEERING EXAMPLE 2:The turbo hoses: Consider the clamp that goes rear-most towards the driver on the CA system. Rather than install a ruddy awkward to get at hose clamp with a nut &/c at this hard to reach point the engineers opted for the spring – style hose clamp which can be grasped , loosened and pulled towards the front of the vehicle in one fell swoop…..done deal. GOOD ENGINEERING EXAMPLE 3:If you learn how the computer calculates some things, it is possible to get around many difficulties. GOOD ENGINEERING EXAMPLE 4:There is room to mount the Pro-vent on front of the standard air intake within its prescribed operating angles (when I put mine there I will probably publish) as oil will coalesce with filter when the Pro-vent is cooler. GOOD ENGINEERING EXAMPLE 5:Did you know that there are capacitors in your truck that hold charge even when the battery terminal is disconnected? This is why, sometimes, you cannot cancel codes…..the necessary circuits remain energised…..like the automatic locking systems etc. Memories are retained. This explains why it won’t go into learning mode for driving techniques sometimes. There is a way to get around this but the method is not for here. GOOD ENGINEERING DESIGN EXAMPLE 6:Don’t forget the ease of air filter changes – undo the clips and slip the new one in without the need to completely remove the lid of the plenum chamber. MY OPINION:These are just some examples of how they form a platform like no other for building the vehicle you want with capabilities beyond most with the same price-tag and in that class. I will only moot the grunt we have @ the whim of our right foot….let alone the fact that doors go “THOCK” quite solidly when they are closed, ease of access to liners etc….towing capacity in class etc A TIN-CAN we DO NOT HAVE!:D Cheers Auberon |
Thanks for all of that Auberon. I'm no engineer, but I think it's a great vehicle! There are little niggles(internal storage for example), but nothing that can't be overcome. I plan on keeping mine until it falls to bits!:D
When are you planning on mounting your provent? I ask because my wife got me one (and the hoses) for my birthday:)), and I've yet to fit it; most people seem to mount it behind the battery box near the firewall. I look forward to seeing how you do yours, so I'll hold off for the time being:) |
I agree Aubs, lots of very good ideas in the beasts, I did hear one of the designers was very disappointed that the original front suspension design was not used tho. It was a cross between IFS and beam axle, best of both worlds, would have had 18inches of travel. Pity it was due to the bean counter that it was not used.
|
Cmohr I recall reading somewhere that the difference in cost between the front independent suspension that the KJ's got and the original design concept suspension with the great articulation that you spoke of, was only $40 per vehicle spread over the expected production volumes. Really sad. I wonder where the engineering drawings are for that original design. Some enterprising young fellow like Marlin at JBA could turn that into a reality - probably cost more than $40 now....
|
Yeah Glen, Heres that artical from here.. http://www.allpar.com/model/jeep/liberty.html .
Quote:
|
Guys,
I found the patent details and the gist of it reads as you can get 10 inches of wheel movement with only 12 mm of axle movement, each in the vertical plane (approximately) - hence reduction of potential weak spots in the drive system. It certainly is impressive but we lucked out so we have to work with what we have. My thoughts are currently running out of left field in that we have what they gave us and it appears to me that this whole system could be dropped away from the monocoque in parallel maintaining driveshaft alignment etc. It is pretty much an "independent unit" like the old "K" member on Valiant chassis. Just look at any reasonable illustration of it. I need to look at this but I think it could be done. If I had the money I would do it but that doesn't mean I will leave it sit - I'm going to work on my ideas....the money will come one day.....lotto,,,,lottery, finding it in a garbage bag....you get the drift. Stupid me wud turn it in if I found it tho. After all we still get 8 inches on either side - its just that we still have half shaft movement of the same magnitude. The Jeep IFS is still probably the best out there (correct me if I'm wrong, please). I know a fellow who does thousands of kms caravaning each year(he wears out a set of tyres on the van every second year) and there are lots of Japanese brands sitting in caravan parks waiting for drive-shafts to arrive - he reckons not so much for Jeep. We just don't get to hear about these little sitters. He drives a 200 series cruiser V8....so he's not exactly a Jeep fan but nearly bought a Jeep when he did buy his truck....he just never goes off road and wanted to lug the van. He thought parts would be a problem but unless it is old Jap you have to ship anyway....and getting someone to fit them.....just as hard but my mate has had just as many issues with his copy of the original 4WD. He can tell many yarns of the sitters who keep their cherished Jap stories of woe fairly quiet. As an aside, if you go to remote areas, my advice is to get to know your vehicle cos changing these basic mechanical items is pretty straight forward....especially in a Jeep if you cultivate your skills. Just camp and drink beers until they arrive or whatever pleases you, carry a manual on CD...if you must use a mechanic they should be able to read unless he/she is one of the many bushies I have known who welds without a helmet. I think we just put "it" out there. I know doctors who have Japanese 4wds with intermittent faults in the driveline - she described the symptoms & I could easily tell her which trouble light was on....and which wiggle test to get her mechanic to do...they all do it not just Jeeps. I happen to think we are quite lucky in that the vehicle is that much tougher than most and with a few little tricks you can make a Jeep run - even now with computer issues. So there you have it, guys, I'm a Mopar nut from the Harden & Johnson days (oops that tells of age) but they are good in their own right, just they aren't the copies that have been made in the millions and you won't convince me that the Japanese don't have mean little bean counters too. Despite what they have done to us in shortcutting. Catch up later Cheers Auberon |
Auberon,
I am impressed with your love for your Jeep, I do however disigree with your comments on the front end of a Kj being a good design. Here are my reasons. Lower control arms have way too much downward sweep, severely limiting ground clearance in ruts, especially since it's a struggle to even fit 31" tyres. Upper control arms are way too short, limiting wheel travel and causing massive bump steer, which is where most of KJ's poor front tyre wear comes from. Also causes upper ball joint contact with spring. Even in completely standard trim my front tyres contacted the sway bar on turns. Nowhere near enough camber and castor adjustment available especially when lifted. Full aluminium front diff housing in a 4X4, what were they thinking? I know they're not the only ones to do this. This is a few good reasons why I beleive that the design is extremely flawed. I am foreman in a large multi franchise dealership, not Jeep, and therefore i get all the wheel alignments that are not stright forward toe adjustments. My KJ, even though I love the little bugger is one of the worst- Most issues, less available adjustment to fix, vehicles out there. I also think that the reason you might see more Jap vehicles broken in remote areas is that they probably outnumber IFS Jeeps by about 50 to 1. I personally would much rather a Prado IFS setup in my KJ. Other than all that, I love it.;) |
All times are GMT +10. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
AJOR © 2002 - 2024 AUSJEEPOFFROAD.COM. All corporate trademarked names and logos are property of their respective owners. Ausjeepoffroad is in no way associated with DaimlerChrysler Corporation or Fiat Jeep.
www.ausjeep.com www.ausjeep.com.au www.midlifemate.com ausjeepforum.com www.r9kustoms.com