Quote:
Originally Posted by alexander
hi dom and gildo.. i am not saying your wrong about the jeep setup, as i dont know specifically about that, but i can say that most tachometers dont work like that. the old smiths tachometer in my car (ie circa 1970) did work with a coil in the ignition circuit and wont work from with electronic distributors. but more modern (ie 70s onward) tachometers sense the voltage pulse and dont require significant current to drive them. so there is a good chance that this will work fine.
regards
alexander.
|
Al,
I'd be thinking your Smiths tach would be the tachogenerator type, driven directly by the energy produced in that coil. The Poms did things that way in aircraft and cars for ages. I collect instruments and have a dozen or so examples sitting in my shed - but couldn't say without seeing that particular one.
I think ROK360 is on the right track, he's said it better than me. The tach will work, it still just sits in series with the whole ignition circuit (between the 'run' terminal on the ignition switch and the works in the HEI dizzy) detecting current pulses. It works the same way it always did.
My comments were correct - ithe tach is deliberately designed as a low impedance device so there's no voltage drop incurred in the ignition circuit by inserting the tach.
You can see this in the stock CJ wiring loom - if the tach isn't fitted, the plugs in the loom for connecting to the tach are designed to plug into each other instead, so that the ignition circuit is not broken. It is in a series circuit with the whole shebang, as an ammeter would be in a DC circuit. Try plugging any ammeter directly across a 12V power supply - or to a tach output line from an electronic ignition - and you'd smoke it.