I did some thinking, drank some Guinness and measured the angles with a digital protractor. The sway bar currently sits at 7.5 degrees below level with the stock 140mm links and will (coincidentally) sit 7.5 degrees above level with the new end links. With 13mm more lift or shorter links, the sway bar will sit at 5 degrees.
It's more than the ideal angle but it's not that bad. It shouldn't worry the handling too much, considering the Wrangler already has a pretty firm front sway bar (see physics note below). I googled the hell out of this and as far as I can see, the sway bar can rotate upward almost vertically without hitting anything so I am not worried about clearance anymore.
I have to make lemonade with this Lovell suspension because I am not going to replace it for a long while even though it is going to be the (hugely) limiting factor to the suspension flex. DBOR are sending me 0.75" spacers which will help with the sway bar angle but also to get back the lift that the heavy accessories have taken.
My physics brain is powered by Jameson so today was the ideal day for this. Go drink some Guinness if physics don't interest you.
As far as I can work out, more of the force will be applied along the sway bar instead of perpendicular to it (using its flex), causing it to act like a thicker and firmer sway bar. That in turn will give more understeer which could actually improve the handling if you like that sort of thing and the sway bar isn't already so firm that it cannot flex easily. Quantifying the effect is very difficult without testing the sway bar spring rate so I gave that up pretty quickly.
All this thinking and reasoning and calculations to quantify the effect is making my brain ache. I need to go home and drink some green beer.
__________________
The average human walks 1,500km per year and drinks 83L of beer which means we're getting 18km/L.
Last edited by st_za; 17-03-2016 at 04:40 PM.
Reason: Shpelling corrections
|