M/T and Cooper come out of the same factory, same warranty, same compounds, different tread patterns.
This was blatently obvious at the 4x4 show over the weekend with the M/T stand directly in front of us. They had a couple of very large posters compairing wet and dry grip with the MTZ versus the other major mud tyres on the market and the times around a slalom course and a set track.
Obviously the MTZ came out on top, but why wasn't the Cooper STT or ST compared?
I have heard so many horror stories of people's Cooper tyres turning wet roads into ice rinks when they are 1/3 - 1/2 worn down. The President of our club, MJOC, has them on his XJ and he's said they are dangerous on the road in the wet.
The Yokohama is the "sleeper" of the pack. They self clean very well, great grip in all surfaces, very good tread life, little if any noise and unlike BFG, Cooper, M/T and any other brands that I know of they're the only oness that warranty against side wall stakes and damage on or off road.
__________________
I'm interested in apathy.
2014 Anvil JKU Rubicon
|