Servicing the Commander meself (5.7 Hemi) - Page 3 - AUSJEEPOFFROAD.COM Jeep News Australia and New Zealand

Go Back   AUSJEEPOFFROAD.COM Jeep News Australia and New Zealand > JEEP GARAGE > XH Commander and WH Grand Cherokee
Register Forums Trading Your Jeep My Garage Mark All Read

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #15  
Old 31-07-2013
JamesLaugesen  JamesLaugesen is offline
Full Flexer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hills District, Sydney
Age: 40
Posts: 874
What Jeep do I drive?: WH
Likes: 34
Liked 130 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Sorry Hoonz I'm not down with your logic .
I agree that oil temp varies more than water temp; but the oil is still ultimately cooled by the cooling system (even without an oil cooler.).
I also agree that thicker oil will drain down slower/less than thinner oil, even at operating temp.

But your logic is off about the protection, which is "better" for the engine, etc.

Even an average 15W-50 drains off vertical faces a lot more than you'd expect when warm. Of course it leaves a slightly thicker film than a thinner oil, but it's not proportional to what you see when the oils are cold.
Even then thicker film still offers bugger-all lubrication to a running engine; of course it does offer more lubrication than a thinner film, but that's not the point.

The point is that most components rely on oil pressure for lubrication, not just the presence of oil.
The system is designed for a certain range of viscosity; to circulate the oil with appropriate flow and pressure, increase the viscosity and you're decreasing the flow and pressure.

So you might have a bit more lubrication for the first few revolutions immediately on start-up, but for the thousands of other revolutions while the oil warms up, you have less pressure, thus less lubrication.
Once warmed up, if the oil really is running slightly hotter than the engine is spec'd for, then you'll hopefully have normal flow and pressure and everything will be good from then-on.
But if the oil is still thicker even at running temp, then you've got less lubrication for the entire drive, under load, etc... obviously not cool!

Since oils are labelled at standard operating temperatures.
A 10W-40 for example, is a 40 at a standard temperature.
Your logic is that your oil is running slightly hotter than standard, so you'll run a slightly thicker oil (say a 50.), which will effectively be dropped back to a 40 (at your slightly hotter temperature.).
The problem is that most oils aren't labelled with a viscosity vs temp. chart, and that data can even be a real pain to get from the manufacturers.
So you really don't know (without a lot of research.) what happens to viscosity at the higher temperature you're ball-parking... the viscosity might stay higher than you want, or even drop sharply below.

There's shedloads of charts around from the old-school guys, showing temperature ranges and what-not.
They're either a pretty good chart as mentioned above for traditional mineral oils for back in the old days, or they're essentially showing which are the cheapest oils adequate for a climate.
ie, 15W-40 is adequate for a typical engine in Aus, and cheaper than a 0W-40, but not "better".

When you're talking ultra high-quality oils like a 0W-60; you have something that can circulate as quickly as possible, maintain a high viscosity at operating temperature, while also tending to be more stable at excessive temperatures.
But the oil system needs to be designed for such a high viscosity, you can't just whack it in an OEM system and expect an improvement.

Aanyway, so based on all this guff, I was convinced that a 0W-30 was perfect for hemis here. I figured 30 hot would get close enough to the spec'd 20.
But after trying 5W-20 thanks to guys like warod, my mind was blown .
Much better economy (most likely just due to the MDS being happier.), much quieter and the hemi tick stops literally 2-3 seconds after start-up, even after sitting for weeks in winter.
I'll be going 0W-20 next and expect it to be better again (hopefully not tick at all on start-up.).

Sorry for the big rant everyone, but I've kept out of the oil debates for too long . I don't expect anyone to change their minds, but at-least do some research (real research.) or experiments and find out for yourselves.

Aaand, at-least can we please stop this comparison of cold ratings.
ie, 5W-30 vs 10W-30... regardless of all of the crap above, there is no comparison - Lower cold viscosity is always better - End of story.
The only reason to use a 15W-40 over a 0W-40 is to save money, which is fair-enough, but don't be fooled into thinking that it's "better" for your engine.
  #16  
Old 02-08-2013
57 HEMI  57 HEMI is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 32
What Jeep do I drive?: XH
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

Wow, there's a lot of info here Guys, thanks for the input

I fully appreciate that a lower viscosity works wonders for MDS, I won't challenge that point, and thanks for bringing that to my attention Guys. But in all honesty, MDS hasn't really phased me much at all, mainly because I'm not convinced it's that effective on the brick shaped Commander to begin with. The best economy I've ever seen on mine is 12.6L/100, and that was a one-off, long before the roof rack, lift kit, and 32"s were fitted. It rarely drops below 14L/100 at best, and that's on the open road.

As for the oil burning issue, you made an interesting point LSE 3.9, although I'm not sure that I'm prepared to change my oil at closer intervals, though it might be an option in the future, thanks

James, you might have a point about my stuffed air filter, although I'm really hoping that's not the case I will check out the GK section at a later stage as you've suggested.

Apologies if I haven't mentioned everyone, but thanks again for your help, much appreciated.
__________________
I'm not stuck. I'm thinking...
  #17  
Old 22-12-2013
57 HEMI  57 HEMI is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 32
What Jeep do I drive?: XH
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Red face

Right, so I've conducted my little experiment using 10W-40 as an alternative. I do roughly between 7,000 - 8,000 km between services, so my oil consumption is based on these figures.
Using 5W-30, the hemi burned about 1.5 litres.
Using 10W-40, it burned about 1.2 litres.

There doesn't appear to be any real benefit in using 10W-40, and I'm not prepared to go thicker to resolve the oil burning issue.

IMO, some motors just burn oil, that's all there is to it. The amount of consumption will vary between motors, be it hemi or not. I'll just have to accept that mines burns 1.5litres between services, and top it up when necessary.

Mind you, I didn't notice much of a change in MDS operation, if anything just a slight increase in fuel consumption. I've never used 5W-20, so I really can't compare.

I've gone back to using 5W-30, as Nulon's website has suggested, although I'm curious to know why they don't recommend their own brand of 5W-20, not that I've looked into it though...
__________________
I'm not stuck. I'm thinking...

Last edited by 57 HEMI; 22-12-2013 at 11:05 PM.
  #18  
Old 23-12-2013
JamesLaugesen  JamesLaugesen is offline
Full Flexer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hills District, Sydney
Age: 40
Posts: 874
What Jeep do I drive?: WH
Likes: 34
Liked 130 Times in 96 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 HEMI View Post
Right, so I've conducted my little experiment using 10W-40 as an alternative. I do roughly between 7,000 - 8,000 km between services, so my oil consumption is based on these figures.
Using 5W-30, the hemi burned about 1.5 litres.
Using 10W-40, it burned about 1.2 litres.

There doesn't appear to be any real benefit in using 10W-40, and I'm not prepared to go thicker to resolve the oil burning issue.

IMO, some motors just burn oil, that's all there is to it. The amount of consumption will vary between motors, be it hemi or not. I'll just have to accept that mines burns 1.5litres between services, and top it up when necessary.

Mind you, I didn't notice much of a change in MDS operation, if anything just a slight increase in fuel consumption. I've never used 5W-20, so I really can't compare.

I've gone back to using 5W-30, as Nulon's website has suggested, although I'm curious to know why they don't recommend their own brand of 5W-20, not that I've looked into it though...
That's an interesting experiment, thanks for posting it.
... Are you willing to try a 0W-20 next just for comparison?

Has your Hemi always used 5W-30?
IMO we can't rule out the thicker weight oil causing excessive wear until proven otherwise - Chrysler are very clear about the Hemi using a 20, including hot climates like southern US and South Africa etc.
The conspiracy is that it's only spec'd for the US CAFE regulations... But even so, they must have engineered the engine for it, otherwise they'd spec a thicker oil in non-CAFE regions (like some other cars like CRVs.).
If that's the case, I think it's logical to assume a Hemi running 30 weight has less oil flow than it was engineered for.
  #19  
Old 23-12-2013
57 HEMI  57 HEMI is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 32
What Jeep do I drive?: XH
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

As far as I know James, it has always used 5W-30. As for causing damage through using 10W-40, I'm happy to rule that one out

We all hear about how modern motors have much tighter clearances than vehicles of yesteryear, so I figured "let's find out for sure". As I also own a 40 year old Leyland P76 (laugh if you will, doesn't phase me ) I compared their tolerances with each other before trying 10W-40, and the results may suprise some, as it did me. Now, as you see these comparisons below, keep in mind that the P76's recommended mineral oil grade is 20W-50. All mearurements are imperial;

PISTON CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0008 - 0.0019
P76 4.4L - 0.0008 - 0.0012

PISTON GUDGEON CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.00035 - 0.0007
P76 4.4L - 0.0003 - 0.0006

CONROD SIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.003 - 0.0137
P76 4.4L - 0.010

MAIN BEARING CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0009 - 0.002
P76 4.4L - 0.0009 - 0.0025

BIGEND BEARING CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0023
P76 4.4L - 0.0006 - 0.0022

CAMSHAFT JOURNAL CLEARANCE (LOWEST TO HIGHEST):
5.7L HEMI - 0.0015 - 0.0035
P76 4.4L - 0.0005 - 0 0035

HYDRAULIC TAPPET CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0024
P76 4.4L - 0.0008 - 0.0023

INLET VALVE STEM TO GUIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0008 - 0.0025
P76 4.4L - 0.001 - 0.003

EXHAUST VALVE STEM TO GUIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0009 - 0.0025
P76 4.4L - 0.0025 - 0.0035

TOP RING GAP:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0090 - 0.0149
P76 4.4L - 0.010 - 0.019

SECOND RING GAP:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0137 - 0.0236
P76 4.4L - 0.010 - 0.019

TOP RING SIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0026
P76 4.4L - 0.002

SECOND RING SIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0022
P76 4.4L - 0.002

Bit long winded, but I thought some of you would find that interesting.

I'm not sure that I want to drop to 0W-20 though James. After the basic comparison above, I'm still struggling with the idea of going any thinner than 5W-30, though I might try 5W-20 on the next service...
__________________
I'm not stuck. I'm thinking...

Last edited by 57 HEMI; 23-12-2013 at 07:44 PM.
  #20  
Old 24-12-2013
JamesLaugesen  JamesLaugesen is offline
Full Flexer
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Hills District, Sydney
Age: 40
Posts: 874
What Jeep do I drive?: WH
Likes: 34
Liked 130 Times in 96 Posts
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by 57 HEMI View Post
As far as I know James, it has always used 5W-30. As for causing damage through using 10W-40, I'm happy to rule that one out

We all hear about how modern motors have much tighter clearances than vehicles of yesteryear, so I figured "let's find out for sure". As I also own a 40 year old Leyland P76 (laugh if you will, doesn't phase me ) I compared their tolerances with each other before trying 10W-40, and the results may suprise some, as it did me. Now, as you see these comparisons below, keep in mind that the P76's recommended mineral oil grade is 20W-50. All mearurements are imperial;

PISTON CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0008 - 0.0019
P76 4.4L - 0.0008 - 0.0012

PISTON GUDGEON CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.00035 - 0.0007
P76 4.4L - 0.0003 - 0.0006

CONROD SIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.003 - 0.0137
P76 4.4L - 0.010

MAIN BEARING CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0009 - 0.002
P76 4.4L - 0.0009 - 0.0025

BIGEND BEARING CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0023
P76 4.4L - 0.0006 - 0.0022

CAMSHAFT JOURNAL CLEARANCE (LOWEST TO HIGHEST):
5.7L HEMI - 0.0015 - 0.0035
P76 4.4L - 0.0005 - 0 0035

HYDRAULIC TAPPET CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0024
P76 4.4L - 0.0008 - 0.0023

INLET VALVE STEM TO GUIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0008 - 0.0025
P76 4.4L - 0.001 - 0.003

EXHAUST VALVE STEM TO GUIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0009 - 0.0025
P76 4.4L - 0.0025 - 0.0035

TOP RING GAP:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0090 - 0.0149
P76 4.4L - 0.010 - 0.019

SECOND RING GAP:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0137 - 0.0236
P76 4.4L - 0.010 - 0.019

TOP RING SIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0026
P76 4.4L - 0.002

SECOND RING SIDE CLEARANCE:
5.7L HEMI - 0.0007 - 0.0022
P76 4.4L - 0.002

Bit long winded, but I thought some of you would find that interesting.

I'm not sure that I want to drop to 0W-20 though James. After the basic comparison above, I'm still struggling with the idea of going any thinner than 5W-30, though I might try 5W-20 on the next service...
The clearance comparisons are interesting thanks
Although I was more just referring to the possible engineering for 20 weight in general; metrics expected by the control modules and their logic. Such as pressure vs flow rate vs temperature etc.

If you're considering experimenting with a 5W-20, I'd strongly suggesting trying a 0W-20 instead.
There's no difference when warm, and it'll circulate earlier when cold.
The concept of a thicker cold rating 'clinging' to the walls to protect during startup is a fallacy (created to help sell cheap 15W-XX oils I guess.), the oil is at its warm viscosity while draining, a 0W-60 or 20W-60 are both gunna drain off the walls equally.
A 5W-20 spec can be made using cheaper base stock than a 0W-20. So with the limited supply & demand for 20 weights in Aus, a 0W-20 is a safer bet IMO (rather than trawling through data-sheets to find out for sure.). Especially since the prices are all the same.

Oh I was also including the 5W-30 as a thicker oil... You've gotta admit that Chrysler are clear about using 20 weights in the hemis (in all cars and regions.).
Sure it's unlikely that a 30 should cause engine damage... But if it does?
The most common anti-20 stance is that it's worse for engines because it's too thin, and is only spec'd because CAFE forces manufacturers to adopt it.
The point that's missed is that the US manfacuturers have been engineering for it for a long time - It's not just a sticker they whack on.

Totally not trying to have a go at you though, just having a bit of a rant
  #21  
Old 18-01-2014
57 HEMI  57 HEMI is offline
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 32
What Jeep do I drive?: XH
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Default

It's all good James, I can handle a little critisism

I'm not too worried about the whole "oil clinging" thing in any case, moreso the oil burning issue.

I'm still reluctant to run 0W-20 at this stage, but I will consider 5W-20. Still curious as to why NULON recommends 5W-30 over 5W-20?
__________________
I'm not stuck. I'm thinking...
Post New Thread  Reply



Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On





All times are GMT +10. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Advertisements




AJOR does not vouch for or warrant the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any message, and are not responsible for the contents of any message. The messages express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of AJOR or any entity associated with AJOR, nor should any advice be substituted as technical advice replacing that of a mechanic. You agree, through your use of this service, that you will not use AJOR to post any material which is knowingly false and/or defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, religious, political or otherwise violative of any law. You agree not to post any copyrighted material unless the copyright is owned by you or by AJOR. The owner, administrators and moderators of AJOR reserve the right to delete any message or members for any or no reason whatsoever. You remain solely responsible for the content of your messages, and you agree to indemnify and hold harmless AJOR, the administrators, moderators, and their agents with respect to any claim based upon transmission of your message(s). The use of profile signatures to intentionally mislead or misdirect any member on this forum is not acceptable and may result in your account being suspended. Any trip that is organised through the AJOR forum is participated at your own risk. If you or your vehicle is damaged it is your responsibility, not that of the person that posted the thread, message or topic initiating the trip, nor the organisers of AJOR or moderators of any specific forum. This forum and associated website is the property of AJOR. No user data is harvested and no information supplied in your registration will be sold for profit.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.

AJOR © 2002 - 2024 AUSJEEPOFFROAD.COM. All corporate trademarked names and logos are property of their respective owners. Ausjeepoffroad is in no way associated with DaimlerChrysler Corporation or Fiat Jeep.
www.ausjeep.com www.ausjeep.com.au www.midlifemate.com ausjeepforum.com www.r9kustoms.com
vB Ad Management by =RedTyger=