Hmm... can anybody say "revenue raising"???
I did hear a while back that a guy got out of a speeding ticket (not sure which state) by taking it to court and protesting that the covert means which were used to hide the camera's operation meant it could only be seen as revenue raising and not a deterrent.
He claimed that if the police were serious in reducing speeds and associated accidents then the cameras should be visible and hidden. The judge asked the police to respond and positively identify how a disguised camera can reduce speeds when the offence is not realised til some weeks later. If not, then it could only be seen as revenue raising.
Of course the police would not admit to revenue raising so the case was closed as entrapment or something similar. Cant remember the exact details but if I find them again I will post a link.
__________________
Cheers, Dave :)
2010 JK, then a 2015 KL Trailhawk, now a 2017 GC Trailhawk!
Over 5000 Club
|